BIKRAM KUMAR MUNDA ALIAS VIKRAM KUMAR MUNDA vs SRI MANOJ AGRAWAL,THE CHIEF MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED, Advocate - ANOOP KR MEHTA, ,AMIT KUMAR SINHA — Cont.(Cvl)/358/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010434352025
Filing Number
Cont.(Cvl)/14608/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
Cont.(Cvl)/358/2026
Registration Date
06-Apr-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 118 )
Sub-Category
Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 15-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BIKRAM KUMAR MUNDA ALIAS VIKRAM KUMAR MUNDA
Adv. RANJAN KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.SRI MANOJ AGRAWAL,THE CHIEF MANAGING DIRECTOR, M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED, Advocate - ANOOP KR MEHTA, ,AMIT KUMAR SINHA
-
2.SRI MURLI KRISHANA RAMAIYA, THE DIRECTOR (PERSONNEL), M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,
-
3.SRI KUMAR MANOJ, THE GENERAL MANAGER (PERSONNEL), M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED,
-
4.SRI S.B. KUMAR, THE GENERAL MANAGER, M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED, CHANCH VICTORIA AREA - 12,
-
5.SRI SUBHASHISH CHAKRABORTY, AGENT, BASANTI MATA COLLIERY,
-
6.SRI SAYAK GOOWAMI, THE AREA PERSONNEL MANAGER (MP AND R), M/S BHARAT COKING COAL LIMITED
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
10-Apr-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Summary: In Contempt (Civil) Case No. 358 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, the court granted six weeks' time to the opposite party (Sri Manoj Agrawal, Chief M.D. of M/s BCCL and others) to comply with the Court's previously issued order. The case was adjourned with this compliance period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
03-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/358/2026
Summary: In Contempt (Civil) Case No. 358 of 2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, the court granted six weeks' time to the opposite party (Sri Manoj Agrawal, Chief M.D. of M/s BCCL and others) to comply with the Court's previously issued order. The case was adjourned with this compliance period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts