BAPPA MALLICK vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NAWIN KR SINGH — B.A./11991/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 96,137(2),POCSO,ACT,8,12,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 26th March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010434252025
Filing Number
B.A./28824/2025
Filing Date
15-Dec-2025
Registration No
B.A./11991/2025
Registration Date
19-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
26-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BAPPA MALLICK
Adv. PRANABESH KR PAUL,AVISHEK CHANDRA,AVISHEK CHANDRA, ,AVISHEK CHANDRA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - NAWIN KR SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
26-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to 19-year-old Bappa Mallick, who had been in custody since October 14, 2025, on charges under the POCSO Act and BNS sections. The court considered that the victim's statement indicated she voluntarily left with the petitioner while annoyed with her parents and refused medical examination, leading to the bail decision with conditions including a Rs. 25,000 bond, two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
11-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
15-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./11991/2025
The Jharkhand High Court granted bail to 19-year-old Bappa Mallick, who had been in custody since October 14, 2025, on charges under the POCSO Act and BNS sections. The court considered that the victim's statement indicated she voluntarily left with the petitioner while annoyed with her parents and refused medical examination, leading to the bail decision with conditions including a Rs. 25,000 bond, two sureties, mandatory court attendance, and cooperation with trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts