KULDEEP KUMAR MAHTO vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO — WPC/3213/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010433522025
Filing Number
WPC/14572/2025
Filing Date
12-Dec-2025
Registration No
WPC/3213/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Quashing Matter ( 25 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KULDEEP KUMAR MAHTO
Adv. VISHAL KUMAR RAI
-
2.NAND KISHORE MAHTO
-
3.GULAB MAHTO
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAYANT FRANKLIN TOPPO
-
2.SUB DIVISIONAL MAGISTRATE, KHUNTI
-
3.LAKHAN MAHTO
-
4.RAJU MAHTO
-
5.MAHESH MAHTO
-
6.SANKRANTI DEVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: WPC 3213/2026 The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Kuldeep Kumar Mahto, Nand Kishore Mahto, and Gulab Mahto challenging a notice issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Khunti under Section 164 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The petitioners claimed the land in question (1.74 acres in Khunti) was partitioned in their favor under Partition Suit No. 100/1966. Justice Ananda Sen found that since only a notice had been issued (not a final order), the writ petition was premature and declined to entertain it. The court directed the petitioners to appear before the SDM and present all documents including the partition judgment, which the SDM would consider and decide within three months after hearing all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
27-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3213/2026
Case Summary: WPC 3213/2026 The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Kuldeep Kumar Mahto, Nand Kishore Mahto, and Gulab Mahto challenging a notice issued by the Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Khunti under Section 164 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita. The petitioners claimed the land in question (1.74 acres in Khunti) was partitioned in their favor under Partition Suit No. 100/1966. Justice Ananda Sen found that since only a notice had been issued (not a final order), the writ petition was premature and declined to entertain it. The court directed the petitioners to appear before the SDM and present all documents including the partition judgment, which the SDM would consider and decide within three months after hearing all parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts