VISHWANATH GOPE vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUSHMA AIND — B.A./362/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 64(2),65(1),65(2),BNS,2023,6,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 13th April 2026.
CNR: JHHC010432262025
Filing Number
B.A./28702/2025
Filing Date
12-Dec-2025
Registration No
B.A./362/2026
Registration Date
17-Jan-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
13-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 20-May-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.VISHWANATH GOPE
Adv. DEEPAK KUMAR,MD. IMRAN BEIG,MD. IMRAN BEIG, ,SHANTANU SINGH,MD. IMRAN BEIG
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUSHMA AIND
-
2.VICTIM
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the bail application of Vishwanath Gope, who is accused of raping two minor girls while serving as a church caretaker, citing the serious nature of the allegations and the ongoing trial. The court directed the State to ensure prompt production of remaining witnesses and expedite the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
13-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
10-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
10-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
10-Mar-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
24-Feb-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
08-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
12-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./362/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand rejected the bail application of Vishwanath Gope, who is accused of raping two minor girls while serving as a church caretaker, citing the serious nature of the allegations and the ongoing trial. The court directed the State to ensure prompt production of remaining witnesses and expedite the trial proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts