MANJU MAZUMDAR, THRO HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SUBHASH KUMAR JAIN vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI — WPC/3219/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010430772025
Filing Number
WPC/14482/2025
Filing Date
11-Dec-2025
Registration No
WPC/3219/2026
Registration Date
30-Apr-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANJU MAZUMDAR, THRO HER POWER OF ATTORNEY HOLDER SUBHASH KUMAR JAIN
Adv. RAHUL KR GUPTA,RAKESH KUMAR SINGH,RAKESH KUMAR SINGH, ,SHUBHAM KUMAR,RAKESH KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RANCHI
-
3.ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, RANCHI
-
4.CIRCLE OFFICER, HEHAL ANCHAL
-
5.THE SECRETARY, DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT
-
6.THE DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, RANCHI
-
7.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, DRINKING WATER AND SANITATION DEPARTMENT
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Case Summary: On 04.05.2026, the High Court of Jharkhand (Justice Ananda Sen) adjourned the writ petition filed by Manju Mazumdar against the State of Jharkhand and others. The case was listed together with W.P.(C) No.1758 of 2023 at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on the merits was passed; the matter stands adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
17-Apr-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
08-Jan-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3219/2026
Case Summary: On 04.05.2026, the High Court of Jharkhand (Justice Ananda Sen) adjourned the writ petition filed by Manju Mazumdar against the State of Jharkhand and others. The case was listed together with W.P.(C) No.1758 of 2023 at the request of the petitioner's counsel. No substantive order on the merits was passed; the matter stands adjourned for further proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts