SUNIL KUMAR vs STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR Advocate - SHRESTH GAUTAM, ,HIMANSHU HARSH,RAHUL ANAND,OMPRAKASH — JHHC10427452025
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010427452025
Filing Number
WPC/14356/2025
Filing Date
10-Dec-2025
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 22-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SUNIL KUMAR
Adv. SANJAY KUMAR,SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH,SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH, ,SANJEEV KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED THROUGH ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR Advocate - SHRESTH GAUTAM, ,HIMANSHU HARSH,RAHUL ANAND,OMPRAKASH
-
2.THE GENERAL MANAGER (TA-LRA), STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED, BOKARO STEEL PLANT, TOWN
-
3.THE MANAGER, LAND AND REVENUE, STEEL AUTHORITY OF INDIA LIMITED, BOKARO STEEL PLANT, TOWN
-
4.THE ESTATE OFFICER, BOKARO STEEL PLANT, BOKARO STEEL CITY
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Apr-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Summary: The writ petition (W.P. Filing No. 14356 of 2025) filed by Sunil Kumar against Steel Authority of India Limited has not been registered due to defects. The High Court of Jharkhand granted two weeks' time to remove the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being treated as if it was never filed, with no further action taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Dec-2025
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
10-Dec-2025
Case filed
Summary: The writ petition (W.P. Filing No. 14356 of 2025) filed by Sunil Kumar against Steel Authority of India Limited has not been registered due to defects. The High Court of Jharkhand granted two weeks' time to remove the defects; failure to do so will result in the petition being treated as if it was never filed, with no further action taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts