SURAJ KERKETTA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA — B.A./11825/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18(c),22(c),29,NDPS,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 23rd March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010427222025
Filing Number
B.A./28376/2025
Filing Date
09-Dec-2025
Registration No
B.A./11825/2025
Registration Date
16-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
23-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 26-Mar-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SURAJ KERKETTA
Adv. PRAN PRANAY,ZAID AHMED,ZAID AHMED, ,ZAID AHMED
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - BHOLA NATH OJHA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
23-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Suraj Kerketta, accused of possessing 1.7 kg of opium in an NDPS case. The court considered that the recovered quantity was intermediary, the petitioner had been in custody since September 2025, and had no criminal antecedents. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
23-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
20-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
20-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
04-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./11825/2025
The High Court of Jharkhand granted bail to Suraj Kerketta, accused of possessing 1.7 kg of opium in an NDPS case. The court considered that the recovered quantity was intermediary, the petitioner had been in custody since September 2025, and had no criminal antecedents. Bail was granted on furnishing a bond of Rs. 10,000 with two sureties of equal amount each. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts