BIGU SAHU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND — WPC/3119/2026

Disposed: Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010423062025

Filing Number

WPC/14216/2025

Filing Date

06-Dec-2025

Registration No

WPC/3119/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND REVENUE , TENANCY & NAZUL ( 146 )

Sub-Category

Mutation Proceeding ( 26 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dismissed as Withdrawn

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIGU SAHU

    Adv. ONKAR NATH TEWARY,SHAMAIEL RAZA,SHAMAIEL RAZA, ,SHAMAIEL RAZA

  2. 2.BINOD PRASAD

  3. 3.DHARMENDRA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND

  2. 2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, PALAMU

  3. 3.ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, PALAMU

  4. 4.DEPUTY COLLECTOR, LAND REFORM CHHATARPUR

  5. 5.CIRCLE OFFICER, CHHATARPUR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioners' (Bigu Sahu, Binod Prasad, Dharmendra Kumar) request to withdraw their writ petition against the State of Jharkhand and various land reform officials. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn while granting petitioners liberty to pursue alternative remedies through appeal, with a note that any subsequent delay condonation application will consider the earlier pending writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  5. 22-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/3119/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand allowed the petitioners' (Bigu Sahu, Binod Prasad, Dharmendra Kumar) request to withdraw their writ petition against the State of Jharkhand and various land reform officials. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn while granting petitioners liberty to pursue alternative remedies through appeal, with a note that any subsequent delay condonation application will consider the earlier pending writ petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case