M/S SRI SAI KRSHNA CONSTRUCTIONS REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY JEETENDRA KUMAR vs UNION OF INDIA Advocate - ANIL KUMAR (Addl.SGI) — WPC/6853/2023

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010418642023

Filing Number

WPC/11012/2023

Filing Date

25-Nov-2023

Registration No

WPC/6853/2023

Registration Date

04-Dec-2023

Judge

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Coram

Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Bench Type

Division Bench

Category

TAXATION ( 186 )

Sub-Category

Goods And Service Tax ( 43 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S SRI SAI KRSHNA CONSTRUCTIONS REPRESENTED BY ITS AUTHORISED SIGNATORY JEETENDRA KUMAR

    Adv. RAJESH KUMAR,AMIT KUMAR,AMIT KUMAR, ,MANINDRA KR SINHA,AMIT KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA Advocate - ANIL KUMAR (Addl.SGI)

  2. 2.ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER CGST AND CENTRAL EXCISE HQRS RANCHI

  3. 3.ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL TAX

  4. 4.SUPERINTENDENT OF CENTRAL GOODS AND SERVICE TAX

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 18-Jun-2026

    Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the writ petition (WPC 6853/2023) filed by M/s Sri Sai Krishna Constructions against the Union of India and tax authorities. The petitioner was granted three weeks to clear office objections; failure to do so will result in automatic dismissal for want of prosecution. If objections are cleared, the matter will be scheduled for admission two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jan-2024

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 25-Nov-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/6853/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the writ petition (WPC 6853/2023) filed by M/s Sri Sai Krishna Constructions against the Union of India and tax authorities. The petitioner was granted three weeks to clear office objections; failure to do so will result in automatic dismissal for want of prosecution. If objections are cleared, the matter will be scheduled for admission two weeks thereafter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case