GARGI BANERJEE vs SUBHRENDU VIKAS MUKHERJEE Advocate - SAMEER SAURABH, ,ISHA KAUSHIK,PRITI KUMARI — C.M.P./211/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010417722025

Filing Number

C.M.P./14062/2025

Filing Date

03-Dec-2025

Registration No

C.M.P./211/2026

Registration Date

09-Mar-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )

Sub-Category

ARTICLE-227 ( 13 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GARGI BANERJEE

    Adv. ROHITASHYA ROY ALIS ROHIT ROY,VIBHOR MAYANK,VIBHOR MAYANK, ,TARUN KR MAHATO,SHIVAM KUMAR,VIBHOR MAYANK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUBHRENDU VIKAS MUKHERJEE Advocate - SAMEER SAURABH, ,ISHA KAUSHIK,PRITI KUMARI

  2. 2.VIJAY KUMAR SAHU INFRASTRUCTURE PRIVATE LIMITED THROUGH ITS DIRECTOR SMT. RANI GUPTA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: In C.M.P. No. 211/2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, the court found that the notice to Opposite Party No. 1 (Subhrendu Vikash Mukherjee) was not validly served. The court ordered petitioners to issue fresh notice via speed post and court process within two weeks, filing necessary requisites; failure to do so will result in automatic dismissal. The notice is returnable in six weeks, and the petition will be listed after the service report is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

  5. 12-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

  6. 18-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

  7. 20-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 03-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. C.M.P./211/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In C.M.P. No. 211/2026 before the High Court of Jharkhand, the court found that the notice to Opposite Party No. 1 (Subhrendu Vikash Mukherjee) was not validly served. The court ordered petitioners to issue fresh notice via speed post and court process within two weeks, filing necessary requisites; failure to do so will result in automatic dismissal. The notice is returnable in six weeks, and the petition will be listed after the service report is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case