JOHAN TOPNO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI — WPC/3101/2026

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 29th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010414702025

Filing Number

WPC/13955/2025

Filing Date

01-Dec-2025

Registration No

WPC/3101/2026

Registration Date

27-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )

Sub-Category

RENT RECEIPT ( 14 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

29-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 20-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JOHAN TOPNO

    Adv. ANIL KUMAR GANJHU,PRIYANKA KUMARI,PRIYANKA KUMARI, ,PRIYANKA KUMARI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI

  2. 2.THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, LAND AND REVENUE DEPARTMENT,

  3. 3.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KHUNTI,

  4. 4.DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, RANCHI,

  5. 5.CIRCLE OFFICER, TORPA,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 29-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of the writ petition filed by Johan Topno seeking resumption of rent receipt issuance for 1.28 acres of land in Khunti district. The court directed the petitioner to approach the Deputy Commissioner, Khunti, to reconsider his grievance, with the Deputy Commissioner to pass an appropriate order either accepting the rent or communicating the rejection to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Apr-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  5. 20-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 01-Dec-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/3101/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of the writ petition filed by Johan Topno seeking resumption of rent receipt issuance for 1.28 acres of land in Khunti district. The court directed the petitioner to approach the Deputy Commissioner, Khunti, to reconsider his grievance, with the Deputy Commissioner to pass an appropriate order either accepting the rent or communicating the rejection to the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case