M/S HINDUSTAN DORR-OLIVER LTD. vs M/S. URANIUM CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. Advocate - SUDARSHAN SHRIVASTAVA — A.APPL/3/2026
Case under An Application U/s 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act,1996 Section 11(5),&,(6),A,&,C,ACT,1996. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010410112025
Filing Number
A.APPL/13820/2025
Filing Date
27-11-2025
Registration No
A.APPL/3/2026
Registration Date
27-01-2026
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
ARBITRATION ( 103 )
Sub-Category
Arbitration & Concilation Ordinance, 1996 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
M/S HINDUSTAN DORR-OLIVER LTD.
Adv. ANOOP KR MEHTA,ATUL RAI,ATUL RAI, ,PRATYUSH,MANISH KUMAR,ATUL RAI
Respondent(s)
M/S. URANIUM CORPORATION OF INDIA LTD. Advocate - SUDARSHAN SHRIVASTAVA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
LAWAZIMA
Admission
Admission
Admission
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 20-12-2025 | LAWAZIMA |
| 30-01-2026 | Admission |
| 08-05-2026 | Admission |
| 10-04-2026 | Admission |
| 27-02-2026 | Admission |
Orders
Court Decision Summary The Jharkhand High Court granted Hindustan Dorr-Oliver Limited's application and appointed Justice C. Praveen Kumar as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes with Uranium Corporation of India Limited arising from their 2009 contract. The court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, it need only examine the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement—which was clearly established—and deferred all substantive objections (including claims of staleness, applicant's corporate insolvency status, and party capacity issues) to the arbitral tribunal for full adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Jharkhand High Court granted Hindustan Dorr-Oliver Limited's application and appointed Justice C. Praveen Kumar as sole arbitrator to resolve disputes with Uranium Corporation of India Limited arising from their 2009 contract. The court held that under Section 11(6) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, it need only examine the prima facie existence of an arbitration agreement—which was clearly established—and deferred all substantive objections (including claims of staleness, applicant's corporate insolvency status, and party capacity issues) to the arbitral tribunal for full adjudication. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts