KRISHNA MURARI SWARNKAR vs PUSHPA DEVI — Cr.Rev./1202/2025
Case under A Revision U/s 19(4) of the Family Courts Act, 1984 Section 125,Cr,PC. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010409862025
Filing Number
Cr.Rev./27177/2025
Filing Date
27-Nov-2025
Registration No
Cr.Rev./1202/2025
Registration Date
11-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
FAMILY MATTERS ( 132 )
Sub-Category
Maintenance ( 28 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 16-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KRISHNA MURARI SWARNKAR
Adv. JITENDRA TRIPATHI,ARUN KUMAR,ARUN KUMAR, ,ARUN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.PUSHPA DEVI
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
15-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF
Case Summary: In Cr.Rev. 1202/2025, the High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party Pushpa Devi regarding the petitioner Krishna Murari Swarnkar's application. The petitioner's counsel argued that evidence shows the petitioner supports the opposite party and her daughter, which the opposite party has admitted. The court directed the opposite party to file a response within two weeks and adjourned the case for listing after notice is served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
14-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
07-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
30-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
23-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
16-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay
-
09-Apr-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Pradeep Kumar Srivastava
-
25-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
27-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.Rev./1202/2025
Case Summary: In Cr.Rev. 1202/2025, the High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party Pushpa Devi regarding the petitioner Krishna Murari Swarnkar's application. The petitioner's counsel argued that evidence shows the petitioner supports the opposite party and her daughter, which the opposite party has admitted. The court directed the opposite party to file a response within two weeks and adjourned the case for listing after notice is served. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts