M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED, THRO ITS AREA FINANCE MANAGER, D. VENKATA RAJESH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — WPC/3937/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010408942025
Filing Number
WPC/13783/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
WPC/3937/2026
Registration Date
27-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
TAXATION ( 186 )
Sub-Category
Jharkhand Value Added Tax Act, 2005 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
10-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 11-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.M/S CENTRAL COALFIELDS LIMITED, THRO ITS AREA FINANCE MANAGER, D. VENKATA RAJESH
Adv. PRITAM KR LALA, ,AYUSHRI,AVINASH KUMAR,BINOD KUMAR,PREITY SINHA,NAMIT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN
-
2.THE COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX,
-
3.THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF COMMERCIAL TAX (APPEALS), HAZARIBAG DIVISION, HAZARIBAG,
-
4.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF STATE TAX RAMGARH CIRCLE, RAMGARH,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
10-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of Central Coalfields Limited's writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to apply before the Appellate Authority for expeditious disposal of its pending appeal, as the petitioner's counsel stated satisfaction with expedited processing rather than substantive relief. The court declined to intervene directly, noting it lacked even the appeal number, leaving the matter for the Appellate Authority to address. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
18-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3937/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand disposed of Central Coalfields Limited's writ petition by granting liberty to the petitioner to apply before the Appellate Authority for expeditious disposal of its pending appeal, as the petitioner's counsel stated satisfaction with expedited processing rather than substantive relief. The court declined to intervene directly, noting it lacked even the appeal number, leaving the matter for the Appellate Authority to address. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts