SRISHTI KUMARI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA — Cr.M.P./3513/2025
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010407662025
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./27022/2025
Filing Date
26-Nov-2025
Registration No
Cr.M.P./3513/2025
Registration Date
03-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Restoration ( 18 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SRISHTI KUMARI
Adv. SUMIT PRAKASH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILESH KR SINHA
-
2.SHANTANU JAISWAL
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
Case Outcome Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition after finding that notice to Opposite Party no. 2 was not validly served. The petitioner Srishti Kumari was directed to file fresh notice requisites through both speed post and court process within three weeks, failing which the petition shall be dismissed. The rule is returnable in six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
26-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./3513/2025
Case Outcome Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition after finding that notice to Opposite Party no. 2 was not validly served. The petitioner Srishti Kumari was directed to file fresh notice requisites through both speed post and court process within three weeks, failing which the petition shall be dismissed. The rule is returnable in six weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts