KAILASH THAKUR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND — WPC/2809/2026
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010405162025
Filing Number
WPC/13651/2025
Filing Date
24-Nov-2025
Registration No
WPC/2809/2026
Registration Date
18-Apr-2026
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )
Sub-Category
RENT RECEIPT ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAILASH THAKUR
Adv. NAWAL KISHOR PANDEY,KUMAR SURYA PARKASH,KUMAR SURYA PARKASH, ,KUMAR SURYA PARKASH
-
2.SEEMA DEVI
-
3.RAJESH THAKUR ALIAS TUNTUN THAKUR
-
4.CHIKU THAKUR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND
-
2.THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAND, REVENUE AND REGISTRATION, GOVERNMENT OF JHARKHAND
-
3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHANBAD
-
4.THE ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, DHANBAD
-
5.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REFORMS, DHANBAD
-
6.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, NIRSA
-
7.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, EGARKUND
-
8.DULAR CHANDRA THAKUR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Summary of WPC/2809/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand directed the petitioners to produce the plaint, written statement, and/or judgment/decree of Title Partition Suit No.46 of 2012, and clarify whether the disputed land was subject matter of that suit and whether they were parties to it. The case was adjourned for four weeks under the "Admission" heading. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Apr-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
22-Apr-2026
Orders(with defect)
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
17-Apr-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
18-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2809/2026
Summary of WPC/2809/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand directed the petitioners to produce the plaint, written statement, and/or judgment/decree of Title Partition Suit No.46 of 2012, and clarify whether the disputed land was subject matter of that suit and whether they were parties to it. The case was adjourned for four weeks under the "Admission" heading. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts