SAIN TOPPO vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI, ,NAVEEN KUMAR,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,RAHUL RANJAN,ANIKET JAISWAL — Cr.M.P./3576/2025
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010403582025
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./26771/2025
Filing Date
22-11-2025
Registration No
Cr.M.P./3576/2025
Registration Date
08-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Restoration ( 18 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SAIN TOPPO
Adv. Advocate- ,ASHISH KUMAR MANDAL,P.K.MUKHOPADHYAY
Respondent(s)
STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI, ,NAVEEN KUMAR,JASVINDAR MAZUMDAR,RAHUL RANJAN,ANIKET JAISWAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 19-12-2025 | Admission |
Orders
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. 3576/2025 The High Court of Jharkhand granted the petitioner's request to restore Cr.M.P. 1355 of 2023, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution due to counsel's non-appearance on 19.11.2025. The court found the absence was not deliberate and the petitioner had valid grounds to pursue the matter. However, the restoration was made conditional on the petitioner paying ₹10,000 as costs to the opposite party within two weeks, with proof of payment required for the case to be relisted before the appropriate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. 3576/2025 The High Court of Jharkhand granted the petitioner's request to restore Cr.M.P. 1355 of 2023, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution due to counsel's non-appearance on 19.11.2025. The court found the absence was not deliberate and the petitioner had valid grounds to pursue the matter. However, the restoration was made conditional on the petitioner paying ₹10,000 as costs to the opposite party within two weeks, with proof of payment required for the case to be relisted before the appropriate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts