CHANDRAMOHAN TANEJA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR — Cr.M.P./1306/2026
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 420,406,467,471,120B,IPC. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010402852025
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./26752/2025
Filing Date
21-11-2025
Registration No
Cr.M.P./1306/2026
Registration Date
29-04-2026
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
Quashing Matter ( 206 )
Sub-Category
Quashing of Entire Criminal Proceedings ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
CHANDRAMOHAN TANEJA
Adv. CHANDRAJIT MUKHERJEE,PREETAM MANDAL,PREETAM MANDAL, ,AVIK GHOSE,PREETAM MANDAL
ASHOK KUMAR TANEJA
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR
PAWAN TANEJA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
LAWAZIMA
Fresh Filing (Admission)
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 15-12-2025 | LAWAZIMA |
| 04-05-2026 | Fresh Filing (Admission) |
Orders
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1306/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party no. 2 via speed post and court process. The petitioners were directed to file requisite documents within two weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed without further consideration. The notice is returnable within six weeks, and the case will be listed for hearing after the service report is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No. 1306/2026 The High Court of Jharkhand issued notice to opposite party no. 2 via speed post and court process. The petitioners were directed to file requisite documents within two weeks, failing which the petition would be dismissed without further consideration. The notice is returnable within six weeks, and the case will be listed for hearing after the service report is received. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts