MANOJ KUMAR MODI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR — Cr.M.P./3506/2025
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010392432025
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./26093/2025
Filing Date
14-Nov-2025
Registration No
Cr.M.P./3506/2025
Registration Date
02-Dec-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Restoration ( 18 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MANOJ KUMAR MODI
Adv. RAKESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR
-
2.SHIV PRASAD AGARWAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court granted Manoj Kumar Modi's petition to restore Acquittal Appeal (C) No. 29 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 14.08.2025. The court accepted Modi's submission that the appeal was dismissed due to a procedural failure—the case could not be marked, preventing his counsel from appearing—rather than substantive grounds. The appeal was restored to its original file stage, with the Public Prosecutor offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
12-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
12-Dec-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary
-
14-Nov-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.M.P./3506/2025
The Jharkhand High Court granted Manoj Kumar Modi's petition to restore Acquittal Appeal (C) No. 29 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 14.08.2025. The court accepted Modi's submission that the appeal was dismissed due to a procedural failure—the case could not be marked, preventing his counsel from appearing—rather than substantive grounds. The appeal was restored to its original file stage, with the Public Prosecutor offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts