MANOJ KUMAR MODI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR — Cr.M.P./3506/2025
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010392432025
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./26093/2025
Filing Date
14-11-2025
Registration No
Cr.M.P./3506/2025
Registration Date
02-12-2025
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Restoration ( 18 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MANOJ KUMAR MODI
Adv. RAKESH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR
SHIV PRASAD AGARWAL
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-12-2025 | Admission |
Orders
The Jharkhand High Court granted Manoj Kumar Modi's petition to restore Acquittal Appeal (C) No. 29 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 14.08.2025. The court accepted Modi's submission that the appeal was dismissed due to a procedural failure—the case could not be marked, preventing his counsel from appearing—rather than substantive grounds. The appeal was restored to its original file stage, with the Public Prosecutor offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Jharkhand High Court granted Manoj Kumar Modi's petition to restore Acquittal Appeal (C) No. 29 of 2025, which had been dismissed for non-prosecution on 14.08.2025. The court accepted Modi's submission that the appeal was dismissed due to a procedural failure—the case could not be marked, preventing his counsel from appearing—rather than substantive grounds. The appeal was restored to its original file stage, with the Public Prosecutor offering no objection. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts