AMRITRAJ SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI — Cr.M.P./3598/2025

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010388442025

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./25836/2025

Filing Date

12-Nov-2025

Registration No

Cr.M.P./3598/2025

Registration Date

09-Dec-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMRITRAJ SINGH

    Adv. AJAY KUMAR SAH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VANDANA BHARTI

  2. 2.TANISHK SHYAMYA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand found that the notice to Opposite Party no. 2 was not validly served and directed issuance of a fresh notice. The petitioner was ordered to file notice requisites via both speed post and court process within two weeks, failing which the petition shall be dismissed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with case listing subject to receipt of service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 19-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 19-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  5. 04-Dec-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 12-Nov-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./3598/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand found that the notice to Opposite Party no. 2 was not validly served and directed issuance of a fresh notice. The petitioner was ordered to file notice requisites via both speed post and court process within two weeks, failing which the petition shall be dismissed. The rule is returnable within six weeks, with case listing subject to receipt of service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case