BIJADHAR MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHYUT KESHAV, ,VIKRAM KUMAR,HARIPRIYA KUMARI,NARESH KUMAR,KHUSHBOO KUMARI,BHAWESH KUMAR TIWARY,SARWESHWARI KUMARI — JHHC10386952025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010386952025

Filing Number

C.M.P./12936/2025

Filing Date

11-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BIJADHAR MAHTO

    Adv. ABHIJEET KUMAR

  2. 2.MADHU SUDAN MAHTO

  3. 3.GANESH MAHTO

  4. 4.SANOJ KUMAR MAHTO

  5. 5.RAM NATH MAHTO

  6. 6.RAVIKANT MAHTO

  7. 7.SHRIKANT MAHTO

  8. 8.MOST BASANTI

  9. 9.KAMAL KISHOR MAHTO

  10. 10.KARU MAHTO

  11. 11.LUBHU MAHTO @ LABOO MAHTO

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - ACHYUT KESHAV, ,VIKRAM KUMAR,HARIPRIYA KUMARI,NARESH KUMAR,KHUSHBOO KUMARI,BHAWESH KUMAR TIWARY,SARWESHWARI KUMARI

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER, SANTHAL PARGANA DIVISION, DUMKA

  3. 3.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GODDA

  4. 4.THE DEPUTY COLLECTOR LAND REVENNE, GODDA

  5. 5.THE CIRCLE OFFICER, PATHARGAMA

  6. 6.RAGHUBIR MAHTO

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

    Case Summary In CMP (Filing) No. 12936 of 2025 before the High Court of Jharkhand, Justice Rajesh Kumar issued notice to the private party on IA No. 2526 of 2026 to file requisite documents within one week, to be served via both Speed Post and ordinary process. The case was adjourned pending compliance with the notice requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF

  4. 01-Dec-2025

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 11-Nov-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In CMP (Filing) No. 12936 of 2025 before the High Court of Jharkhand, Justice Rajesh Kumar issued notice to the private party on IA No. 2526 of 2026 to file requisite documents within one week, to be served via both Speed Post and ordinary process. The case was adjourned pending compliance with the notice requirements. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case