JAGARNATH MURMU ALIAS JAGAN MURMU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MITHILESH SINGH — JHHC10385752025
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010385752025
Filing Number
WPC/12922/2025
Filing Date
11-Nov-2025
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 20-May-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JAGARNATH MURMU ALIAS JAGAN MURMU
Adv. GAURAV KUMAR
-
2.CHARO MANJHI
-
3.KALISHWAR MANJHI
-
4.BASUDEV MURMU
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MITHILESH SINGH
-
2.THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT LAND REFORMS AND REVENUE
-
3.COMMISSIONER, NORTH CHOTANAGPUR DIVISION, HAZARIBAG
-
4.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, RAMGARH
-
5.SETTLEMENT OFFICER
-
6.ASSISTANT SETTLEMENT OFFICER,
-
7.CIRCLE OFFICER
-
8.SALAMAT MIYA
-
9.DAMAL LAL BANDHU MAHTO
-
10.MAHBIR KOIRI
-
11.DHANI RAM MAHTO
-
12.KIASAR MAHTO
-
13.DHANI RAM MAHTO
-
14.KAISAR MAHTO
-
15.DHANI RAM MAHTO
-
16.MAJID MIYA
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
13-Apr-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court found the writ petition (W.P. No. 12922 of 2025) defective and refused to register it. The court granted two weeks' time to the petitioner to rectify the defects; failure to do so will result in the application being treated as if it was never filed, with no further action taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
15-Dec-2025
Lawazima
Registrar (Judicial)
-
11-Nov-2025
Case filed
Summary: The Jharkhand High Court found the writ petition (W.P. No. 12922 of 2025) defective and refused to register it. The court granted two weeks' time to the petitioner to rectify the defects; failure to do so will result in the application being treated as if it was never filed, with no further action taken. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts