MATAN MUNDA ALIAS MATAN BODRA ALIAS SAY@ BODRA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR — Cr.A(SJ)/843/2024
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 18(c),NDPS,ACT. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010382982024
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/26478/2024
Filing Date
29-Oct-2024
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/843/2024
Registration Date
18-Dec-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
DRUGS & MEDICINES ( 125 )
Sub-Category
Narcotics Drugs & Psychotropic Substances Act 1985 ( 5 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MATAN MUNDA ALIAS MATAN BODRA ALIAS SAY@ BODRA
Adv. MAHESH KR VERMA, ,AVILASH KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
Case Summary: In Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 843/2024, the High Court of Jharkhand heard the appeal of Matan Munda alias Matan Bodra against the State of Jharkhand. Since no counsel appeared for the appellants on 04.05.2026, the court adjourned the case for hearing after summer vacation to provide the appellants an opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
21-Apr-2026
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
09-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
03-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
03-Dec-2025
Orders
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
17-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
17-Jul-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
03-Dec-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Oct-2024
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/843/2024
Case Summary: In Cr. Appeal (S.J.) No. 843/2024, the High Court of Jharkhand heard the appeal of Matan Munda alias Matan Bodra against the State of Jharkhand. Since no counsel appeared for the appellants on 04.05.2026, the court adjourned the case for hearing after summer vacation to provide the appellants an opportunity to be heard. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts