SONU KUMAR ALIAS SONU YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA — B.A./401/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,34,IPC. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 23rd March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010367172025

Filing Number

B.A./24502/2025

Filing Date

17-Oct-2025

Registration No

B.A./401/2026

Registration Date

17-Jan-2026

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

SECTION 483 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

23-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 302,201,34,IPC

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SONU KUMAR ALIAS SONU YADAV

    Adv. ZAID IMAM

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANTOSH KUMAR SHUKLA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the bail application (B.A. No. 401/2026) filed by Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Yadav against the State of Jharkhand on 23 March 2026. Upon the petitioner's counsel's submission that all witnesses had been examined and the case reserved for judgment, Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay disposed of the application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 23-Mar-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  4. 25-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  5. 25-Feb-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  6. 12-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. B.A./401/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court disposed of the bail application (B.A. No. 401/2026) filed by Sonu Kumar @ Sonu Yadav against the State of Jharkhand on 23 March 2026. Upon the petitioner's counsel's submission that all witnesses had been examined and the case reserved for judgment, Justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay disposed of the application accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case