ARUN LAL GUPTA ALIAS ARUN KUMAR vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY — JHHC10362552024

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010362552024

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./25184/2024

Filing Date

18-Oct-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARUN LAL GUPTA ALIAS ARUN KUMAR

    Adv. RUPESH KUMAR,ISHAN KUMAR JHA,ISHAN KUMAR JHA, ,ISHAN KUMAR JHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SUBODH KUMAR DUBEY

  2. 2.GOPAL PRASAD

Case History

  1. Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  4. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  5. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  6. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  7. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary In Cr. Revision No. 25184 of 2024, the Jharkhand High Court allowed the petitioner's application to condone a 3-day delay in filing the criminal revision application. However, the court dismissed the petitioner's application seeking exemption from surrender under Rule 159 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules, finding no exceptional circumstances warranted such relief in connection with Complaint Case No. 378 of 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  8. 26-Nov-2024

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  9. 18-Oct-2024

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary In Cr. Revision No. 25184 of 2024, the Jharkhand High Court allowed the petitioner's application to condone a 3-day delay in filing the criminal revision application. However, the court dismissed the petitioner's application seeking exemption from surrender under Rule 159 of the Jharkhand High Court Rules, finding no exceptional circumstances warranted such relief in connection with Complaint Case No. 378 of 2018. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case