BISHWANATH ORAON vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - TARUN KUMAR — B.A./3492/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 65(1),BNS,4/6,POCSO,ACT. Disposed: Contested--Rejected on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010357462025
Filing Number
B.A./23842/2025
Filing Date
13-Oct-2025
Registration No
B.A./3492/2026
Registration Date
22-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Coram
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
WOMEN & CHILDREN ( 196 )
Sub-Category
Protection of children from sexual offences Act ( 14 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Rejected
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BISHWANATH ORAON
Adv. AMIT KUMAR,NEHA KUMARI,NEHA KUMARI, ,RABINDRA KUMAR,NEHA KUMARI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - TARUN KUMAR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
Case Summary: B.A. 3492/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Bishwanath Oraon's bail plea in a POCSO case involving a 14-year-old victim. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary found direct allegations against the 21-year-old petitioner under BNS Section 65(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4/6 sufficient to deny bail, noting the victim's support for prosecution. The court expedited trial proceedings and directed the state to promptly produce witnesses before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary
-
17-Apr-2026
Hon'ble Mrs. Justice Anubha Rawat ChoudharyView PDF
-
07-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Gautam Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
03-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. B.A./3492/2026
Case Summary: B.A. 3492/2026 The Jharkhand High Court rejected Bishwanath Oraon's bail plea in a POCSO case involving a 14-year-old victim. Justice Anubha Rawat Choudhary found direct allegations against the 21-year-old petitioner under BNS Section 65(1) and POCSO Act Sections 4/6 sufficient to deny bail, noting the victim's support for prosecution. The court expedited trial proceedings and directed the state to promptly produce witnesses before the trial court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts