MANOJ KUMAR PODDAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR — Cr.M.P./3265/2025

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010357062025

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./23810/2025

Filing Date

13-Oct-2025

Registration No

Cr.M.P./3265/2025

Registration Date

11-Nov-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANOJ KUMAR PODDAR

    Adv. BHOLA NATH RAJAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHIV SHANKAR KUMAR

  2. 2.DHANANJAY KUMAR SINGH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

    Case Summary: The petition was adjourned due to defective service. The court found that the notice to Opposite Party No. 2 was not validly served and directed the petitioner to file fresh notice requisites through both speed post and court process within three weeks, failing which the petition shall be dismissed. The rule is made returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Feb-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  4. 14-Nov-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF

  5. 14-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary

  6. 10-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 13-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./3265/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The petition was adjourned due to defective service. The court found that the notice to Opposite Party No. 2 was not validly served and directed the petitioner to file fresh notice requisites through both speed post and court process within three weeks, failing which the petition shall be dismissed. The rule is made returnable within six weeks, with further listing contingent on receipt of the service report. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case