KUNDAN KUMAR SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAI PRAKASH,(A A G) — Cont.(Cvl)/514/2026
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 19th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010356762025
Filing Number
Cont.(Cvl)/11890/2025
Filing Date
13-Oct-2025
Registration No
Cont.(Cvl)/514/2026
Registration Date
14-May-2026
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 118 )
Sub-Category
Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
19-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 21-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KUNDAN KUMAR SINGH
Adv. PIYUSH KUMAR ROY
-
2.ATMARA CHOUDHARY
-
3.RAGHUNANDAN SINGH
-
4.MANOJ MANDAL
-
5.SANJAY MANDAL
-
6.BINDESHWARI SINGH @ DINJAY SINGH
-
7.NAVIN KUMAR SINGH @ NAVIN SINGH
-
8.UPENDRA SINGH
-
9.CHANDAN KUMAR SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - JAI PRAKASH,(A A G)
-
2.SHRI C.K. DAS, PRESENTLY POSTED AS DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, SAHIBGANJ
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
19-Jun-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the contempt petition against the District Land Acquisition Officer, finding that the officer's August 2025 order declaring the petitioners ineligible for rehabilitation and resettlement constituted compliance with the Court's earlier March 2025 order. The Court permitted the petitioners to pursue alternate remedies against the ineligibility determination and directed the officer to provide the complete list of displaced farmers within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
19-Jun-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
16-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
13-Oct-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/514/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the contempt petition against the District Land Acquisition Officer, finding that the officer's August 2025 order declaring the petitioners ineligible for rehabilitation and resettlement constituted compliance with the Court's earlier March 2025 order. The Court permitted the petitioners to pursue alternate remedies against the ineligibility determination and directed the officer to provide the complete list of displaced farmers within two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts