JAI KRISHNA MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — Cont.(Cvl)/1264/2025

Disposed: Contested--Dropped on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010350182025

Filing Number

Cont.(Cvl)/11606/2025

Filing Date

07-Oct-2025

Registration No

Cont.(Cvl)/1264/2025

Registration Date

04-Nov-2025

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 118 )

Sub-Category

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dropped

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAI KRISHNA MAHTO

    Adv. ONKAR NATH TEWARY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN

  2. 2.SHRI CHANDRA SHEKHAR, SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE REGISTRATION AND LAND REFORM

  3. 3.SHRI NAMAN PRIYESH LAKRA, DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DEOGHAR

  4. 4.SHRI PIYUSH SINHA, ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR, DEOGHAR

  5. 5.SHRI KRISHNA SINGH MUNDA, CIRCLE OFFICER, PALAJORI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: Jai Krishna Mahto v. State of Jharkhand The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Jai Krishna Mahto's contempt petition after the respondent authorities demonstrated compliance with a prior order dated 25.02.2025 by passing a reasoned order. Justice Ananda Sen found no contempt warranted, disposed of pending interlocutory applications, and reserved liberty for the petitioner to file an appropriate application challenging the substantive order passed by the opposite parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Nov-2025

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  4. 07-Nov-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  5. 07-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/1264/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Jai Krishna Mahto v. State of Jharkhand The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Jai Krishna Mahto's contempt petition after the respondent authorities demonstrated compliance with a prior order dated 25.02.2025 by passing a reasoned order. Justice Ananda Sen found no contempt warranted, disposed of pending interlocutory applications, and reserved liberty for the petitioner to file an appropriate application challenging the substantive order passed by the opposite parties. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case