BASUDEO MAHTO vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — Cont.(Cvl)/1246/2025

Disposed: Contested--Dropped on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010348452025

Filing Number

Cont.(Cvl)/11555/2025

Filing Date

06-Oct-2025

Registration No

Cont.(Cvl)/1246/2025

Registration Date

14-Oct-2025

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 118 )

Sub-Category

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Dropped

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BASUDEO MAHTO

    Adv. ABHIJEET KR SINGH,HARSH CHANDRA,HARSH CHANDRA, ,SAIF ALI ANSARI,SHASHANK KUMAR,HARSH CHANDRA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN

  2. 2.SRI ABHIJEET KUMAR, THE DISTRICT SUPERINTENDENT OF EDUCATION, LOHARDEAGA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  3. 08-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Basudeo Mahto's contempt petition against the State of Jharkhand and the District Superintendent of Education, finding that a reasoned order had already been issued in compliance with the earlier writ court order dated 24.03.2025. The court dropped the contempt proceedings but permitted the petitioner to challenge the reasoned order if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 30-Jan-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  5. 30-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  6. 19-Dec-2025

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  7. 17-Oct-2025

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  8. 17-Oct-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 06-Oct-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/1246/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed Basudeo Mahto's contempt petition against the State of Jharkhand and the District Superintendent of Education, finding that a reasoned order had already been issued in compliance with the earlier writ court order dated 24.03.2025. The court dropped the contempt proceedings but permitted the petitioner to challenge the reasoned order if desired. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case