DEEPMALA KUMARI ALIAS MADAM MALA ALIAS DEEPMALA vs STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN — Cr.M.P./3104/2025

Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010345272025

Filing Number

Cr.M.P./23133/2025

Filing Date

26-Sep-2025

Registration No

Cr.M.P./3104/2025

Registration Date

17-Oct-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )

Sub-Category

Restoration ( 18 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Decision Date

08-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEEPMALA KUMARI ALIAS MADAM MALA ALIAS DEEPMALA

    Adv. KUSHAL KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAJNEESH VARDHAN

  2. 2.JASPAL SINGH SALUJA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.3104 of 2025 The Jharkhand High Court restored ABA Filing No.16218 of 2025 to its original file after it was dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 15.09.2025. The petitioner's counsel explained that the pairvikar (witness) could not appear on time, preventing the filing of the required affidavit. The Court found sufficient cause for restoration, as the State raised no serious objection, and accordingly disposed of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  4. 01-May-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  5. 24-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  6. 17-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  7. 10-Apr-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  8. 20-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  9. 18-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  10. 11-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  11. 25-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  12. 18-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  13. 11-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  14. 04-Feb-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  15. 30-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  16. 28-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  17. 22-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  18. 21-Jan-2026

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  19. 03-Dec-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF

  20. 03-Dec-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  21. 26-Nov-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  22. 19-Nov-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  23. 12-Nov-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  24. 12-Nov-2025

    Admission

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi

  25. 07-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  26. 26-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.M.P./3104/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.M.P. No.3104 of 2025 The Jharkhand High Court restored ABA Filing No.16218 of 2025 to its original file after it was dismissed for non-compliance with a peremptory order dated 15.09.2025. The petitioner's counsel explained that the pairvikar (witness) could not appear on time, preventing the filing of the required affidavit. The Court found sufficient cause for restoration, as the State raised no serious objection, and accordingly disposed of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case