SHANKAR YADAV ALIAS SHANKAR PRASAD YADAV vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY, SATYANSHU SHUBHAM (AMICUS CURIAE),SATYANSHU SHUBHAM — Cr.A(SJ)/900/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 306,IPC. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010343232025
Filing Number
Cr.A(SJ)/22983/2025
Filing Date
25-Sep-2025
Registration No
Cr.A(SJ)/900/2025
Registration Date
15-Oct-2025
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
SECTION 415(2) ( 27 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHANKAR YADAV ALIAS SHANKAR PRASAD YADAV
Adv. ARWIND KUMAR,ABHISHEK RANJAN,ABHISHEK RANJAN, ,ABHISHEK RANJAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - VISHWANATH ROY, SATYANSHU SHUBHAM (AMICUS CURIAE),SATYANSHU SHUBHAM
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal No.900 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the case after appointing Mr. Satyanshu Shubham as Amicus Curiae to represent Respondent No.2, who failed to appear despite valid service of notice. The court directed the office to supply complete pleadings to the Amicus Curiae and scheduled the matter for hearing after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
17-Mar-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Anil Kumar ChoudharyView PDF
-
12-Feb-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
09-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
14-Nov-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
07-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF
-
07-Nov-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad
-
31-Oct-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
25-Sep-2025
Case filed
Registration No. Cr.A(SJ)/900/2025
Case Summary: In Criminal Appeal No.900 of 2025, the High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the case after appointing Mr. Satyanshu Shubham as Amicus Curiae to represent Respondent No.2, who failed to appear despite valid service of notice. The court directed the office to supply complete pleadings to the Amicus Curiae and scheduled the matter for hearing after summer vacation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts