BINAY MUNDA @ VINAY MUNDA vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MD SHAHABUDDIN — WPC/2777/2026

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010342672025

Filing Number

WPC/11302/2025

Filing Date

25-Sep-2025

Registration No

WPC/2777/2026

Registration Date

18-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND ACQUISITION ( 145 )

Sub-Category

Encroachment Matter ( 6 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BINAY MUNDA @ VINAY MUNDA

    Adv. Advocate- ,ANIKET RAJ,VISHWAJEETJEE CHATURVEDI,TARU GUPTA,PRASHANT KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MD SHAHABUDDIN

  2. 2.THE COLLECTOR CUM DIVISIONAL FOREST OFFICER, KHUNTI

  3. 3.FOREST RANGE OFFICER, KHUNTI

  4. 4.CIRCLE OFFICER, NAMKUM

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: In WPC 2777/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition filed by Binay Munda against the State of Jharkhand. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that his client had withdrawn the brief with instructions not to appear. The court noted no valid vakalatnama was filed and the case was defective with no one to press I.A. No. 16099 of 2025. The case was adjourned for two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Orders(with defect)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 30-Apr-2026

    Orders(with defect)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  5. 30-Mar-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  6. 17-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 25-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/2777/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: In WPC 2777/2026, the High Court of Jharkhand adjourned the petition filed by Binay Munda against the State of Jharkhand. The petitioner's counsel informed the court that his client had withdrawn the brief with instructions not to appear. The court noted no valid vakalatnama was filed and the case was defective with no one to press I.A. No. 16099 of 2025. The case was adjourned for two weeks. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case