PRAKASH UDAY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR, ,SACHIN KUMAR — JHHC10324462025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010324462025

Filing Number

WPC/10686/2025

Filing Date

16-Sep-2025

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 26-Mar-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PRAKASH UDAY

    Adv. TEJO MISTRY,MAHADEO THAKUR,MAHADEO THAKUR, ,MAHADEO THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RATNESH KUMAR, ,SACHIN KUMAR

  2. 2.THE CHAIRMAN, JHARKHAND URJA SANCHARAN NIGAM LIMITED

  3. 3.THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, JHARKHAND URJA SANCHARAN NIGAM LIMITED

  4. 4.THE GENERAL MANAGER-CUM-CHIEF ENGINEER, SANCHARAN ZONE-

  5. 5.THE DEPUTY GENERAL MANAGER, (HUMAN RESOURCES), JHARKHAND URJA SANCHARAN NIGAM LIMITED

  6. 6.THE SENIOR MANAGER, (F AND A), TRANSMISSION SUB-DIVISION, NAMKUM, RANCHI

  7. 7.THE ELECTRICAL EXECUTIVE ENGINEER

  8. 8.THE ELECTRICAL SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, JHARKHAND URJA SANCHARAN NIGAM LIMITED

  9. 9.THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION SUB-DIVISION, NAMKUM, RANCHI

  10. 10.THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION SUB-DIVISION, NAMKUM, RANCHI

  11. 11.THE JUNIOR ELECTRICAL ENGINEER, TRANSMISSION SUB-DIVISION, DUMKA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 23-Mar-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Prakash Uday (W.P. 10686/2025) was found to be defective and has not been registered by the High Court of Jharkhand office. The court granted two weeks' time to cure the defects, failing which the petition will be deemed never filed and no further action will be taken. If defects are not removed within the stipulated period, the office will not proceed with the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Nov-2025

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  4. 16-Sep-2025

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The writ petition filed by Prakash Uday (W.P. 10686/2025) was found to be defective and has not been registered by the High Court of Jharkhand office. The court granted two weeks' time to cure the defects, failing which the petition will be deemed never filed and no further action will be taken. If defects are not removed within the stipulated period, the office will not proceed with the matter. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case