ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS ZONAL MANAGER A. SRIRAM vs ANUSHYA DEVI Advocate - ATANU BANERJEE, ,SUGANDHA KHALKHO,KUMAR VIVEK,SUMAN KUMAR GHOSH,ADITYA BANERJEE — MA/6/2025
Case under An Appeal U/s 173 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 173. Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010323902024
Next Hearing
: -
Filing Number
MA/9682/2024
Filing Date
18-09-2024
Registration No
MA/6/2025
Registration Date
07-01-2025
Judge
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Coram
HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
MOTOR VEHICLE ( 152 )
Sub-Category
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 ( 2 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ROYAL SUNDARAM GENERAL INSURANCE CO. LTD, REPRESENTED THROUGH ITS ZONAL MANAGER A. SRIRAM
Adv. MR.ASHUTOSH ANAND
Respondent(s)
ANUSHYA DEVI Advocate - ATANU BANERJEE, ,SUGANDHA KHALKHO,KUMAR VIVEK,SUMAN KUMAR GHOSH,ADITYA BANERJEE
PALAK KUMARI
ROSHAN KUMAR
SUNANDI DEVI
NILAMBAR PRADHAN
PRAMOD KUMAR SINGH
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE THE CHIEF JUSTICE
LAWAZIMA
Admission
Admission
Admission
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 04-10-2024 | LAWAZIMA |
| 12-03-2025 | Admission |
| 05-03-2025 | Admission |
| 19-02-2025 | Admission |
| 12-02-2025 | Admission |
Orders
Case Summary: MA/6/2025 Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. appealed an arbitral award against the respondents (family members of Sudam Pradhan and Pramod Kumar Singh). The High Court of Jharkhand admitted the appeal on May 8, 2026, after the appellant deposited the entire awarded amount with interest via NEFT. The court stayed execution of the impugned award and granted claimants liberty to apply for withdrawal, with trial court records called for review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: MA/6/2025 Royal Sundaram General Insurance Co. Ltd. appealed an arbitral award against the respondents (family members of Sudam Pradhan and Pramod Kumar Singh). The High Court of Jharkhand admitted the appeal on May 8, 2026, after the appellant deposited the entire awarded amount with interest via NEFT. The court stayed execution of the impugned award and granted claimants liberty to apply for withdrawal, with trial court records called for review. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts