NIRAJ KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR — Cr.Rev./534/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 138,NI,ACT. Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010323462025

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./21704/2025

Filing Date

15-Sep-2025

Registration No

Cr.Rev./534/2026

Registration Date

15-May-2026

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

MERCHANTILE LAW ( 150 )

Sub-Category

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 ( 5 )

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 138,NI,ACT

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIRAJ KUMAR

    Adv. ABDUL KALAM RASHIDI,Md. Azam,Md. Azam, ,AFAQUE RASHIDI,AULIA BEGUM,Md. Azam

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - PANKAJ KUMAR

  2. 2.SIDHARCHIT HEALTH CARE THROUGH ITS PROPRIETOR ALKA

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary: Cr.Rev./21704/2025 Petitioner Niraj Kumar sought exemption from surrender under Rule 159 of Jharkhand High Court Rules. The court granted the exemption, noting that Kumar had deposited Rs. 7,25,000 out of Rs. 9,50,000 owed across three cases and had received similar relief in a related case. The main petition was adjourned for admission after notice to opposite party no. 2, with trial court records to be called in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 09-Oct-2025

    Lawazima

    Registrar (Judicial)

  5. 15-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cr.Rev./534/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Cr.Rev./21704/2025 Petitioner Niraj Kumar sought exemption from surrender under Rule 159 of Jharkhand High Court Rules. The court granted the exemption, noting that Kumar had deposited Rs. 7,25,000 out of Rs. 9,50,000 owed across three cases and had received similar relief in a related case. The main petition was adjourned for admission after notice to opposite party no. 2, with trial court records to be called in the interim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case