SHOBHA MURMU vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPTT OF PRIMARY SECONDARY AND MASS EDUCATION Advocate - SACHIN KUMAR — WPC/4338/2020
Disposed: Contested--Allowed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010322552020
Filing Number
WPC/6808/2020
Filing Date
21-Dec-2020
Registration No
WPC/4338/2020
Registration Date
24-Dec-2020
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE RELATING TO STATE GOVT. ( 171 )
Sub-Category
Punishment ( 33 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Allowed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHOBHA MURMU
Adv. ANJANI KR VERMA,BINAY KUMAR SINHA,BINAY KUMAR SINHA, ,BINAY KUMAR SINHA
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY DEPTT OF PRIMARY SECONDARY AND MASS EDUCATION Advocate - SACHIN KUMAR
-
2.THE DIRECTOR SECONDARY EDUCATION JHARKHAND
-
3.THE REGIONAL DEPUTY DIRECTOR OF EDUCATION SANTHAL PARGANA DIVISION DUMKA
-
4.THE DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER DUMKA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
Summary of WPC/4338/2020 - Shobha Murmu v. State of Jharkhand The Jharkhand High Court quashed the dismissal order (Memo 2609 dated 24.9.2018) of Shobha Murmu, a Craft Teacher terminated after 29 years of service, finding the dismissal harsh and disproportionate. The petitioner was dismissed based on alleged irregularities in her 1989 appointment regarding insufficient craft training credentials and non-compliance with reservation rosters, but the court ruled that raising such defects after nearly 30 years of unblemished service violated principles of proportionality and fair play. The court directed reinstatement with all consequential benefits including arrears of salary and seniority, following its earlier decisions in similar cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
06-May-2026
Final Disposal
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
23-Mar-2026
Final Disposal
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
09-Feb-2026
Final Disposal
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
13-Jan-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
13-Jan-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
19-Nov-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
15-Oct-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
18-Sep-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
06-Aug-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Ambuj NathView PDF
-
06-Aug-2024
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Kumar
-
02-Jul-2024
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Rajesh KumarView PDF
-
02-Jul-2024
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
23-Apr-2024
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
26-Feb-2024
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
17-Jan-2024
Admission (Fixed Cases)
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. Pathak
-
03-Jan-2024
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. PathakView PDF
-
24-Nov-2023
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. PathakView PDF
-
24-Nov-2023
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
06-Oct-2023
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
25-Aug-2023
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
24-Jul-2023
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
14-Jun-2023
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
10-Jan-2023
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
10-Oct-2022
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
03-May-2021
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar Dwivedi
-
03-Mar-2021
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Kumar DwivediView PDF
-
19-Jan-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
21-Dec-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/4338/2020
Summary of WPC/4338/2020 - Shobha Murmu v. State of Jharkhand The Jharkhand High Court quashed the dismissal order (Memo 2609 dated 24.9.2018) of Shobha Murmu, a Craft Teacher terminated after 29 years of service, finding the dismissal harsh and disproportionate. The petitioner was dismissed based on alleged irregularities in her 1989 appointment regarding insufficient craft training credentials and non-compliance with reservation rosters, but the court ruled that raising such defects after nearly 30 years of unblemished service violated principles of proportionality and fair play. The court directed reinstatement with all consequential benefits including arrears of salary and seniority, following its earlier decisions in similar cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts