KANHAI KUMAR SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR, ,PRATIUSH LALA,DEEPAK SAHU — JHHC10321572024

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010321572024

Filing Number

Cr.Rev./22522/2024

Filing Date

13-Sep-2024

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon Mukhopadhyay

Bench Type

Single Bench

Judicial Branch

Criminal Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KANHAI KUMAR SINGH

    Adv. RAJ NANDAN CHATTERJEE,DIKSHA RANI,DIKSHA RANI, ,NISHAD KHAN,DIKSHA RANI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SAKET KUMAR, ,PRATIUSH LALA,DEEPAK SAHU

  2. 2.RAJEEV KUMAR SINGH

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

  3. 04-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rongon MukhopadhyayView PDF

    Case Summary Kanhai Kumar Singh's interim application (I.A. No. 3706 of 2025) seeking exemption from surrender under Rule 159 of Jharkhand High Court Rules was dismissed. The petitioner, convicted on 21.02.2024 (affirmed in appeal), claimed readiness to compromise with the opposite party but made only vague statements without demonstrating bona fide intention. The court held this insufficient to constitute an exceptional circumstance warranting exemption from surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 25-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  5. 18-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  6. 11-Jun-2025

    Orders

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay Prasad

  7. 09-Apr-2025

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Sanjay PrasadView PDF

  8. 01-Oct-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 13-Sep-2024

    Case filed

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Kanhai Kumar Singh's interim application (I.A. No. 3706 of 2025) seeking exemption from surrender under Rule 159 of Jharkhand High Court Rules was dismissed. The petitioner, convicted on 21.02.2024 (affirmed in appeal), claimed readiness to compromise with the opposite party but made only vague statements without demonstrating bona fide intention. The court held this insufficient to constitute an exceptional circumstance warranting exemption from surrender. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case