NIPUN KUMAR AGARWAL SANDAMINI GUPTA, ,DHEERAJ KUMAR DUBEY,NUPUR SINGH,ALOK KUMAR VERMA,GAURAV ABHISHEKH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI — WPC/3217/2026

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off As Infractous on 04th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010319962025

Filing Number

WPC/10529/2025

Filing Date

11-Sep-2025

Registration No

WPC/3217/2026

Registration Date

30-Apr-2026

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

Right To Information Act ( 209 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

04-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off As Infractous

Last updated 20-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NIPUN KUMAR AGARWAL SANDAMINI GUPTA, ,DHEERAJ KUMAR DUBEY,NUPUR SINGH,ALOK KUMAR VERMA,GAURAV ABHISHEKH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SANJAY KUMAR TIWARI

  2. 2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM FIREST APPELLATE AUTHORITY, DHANBAD ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR,

  3. 3.DEEPAK KUMAR DUBEY (J.A.S.) PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER,

  4. 4.SHRI RAM NARAYAN KHALKHO, DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER CUM PUBLIC INFORMATION OFFICER,

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 04-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court disposed of Nipun Kumar Agarwal's RTI writ petition as infructuous after the respondent authorities divulged the requested information to the petitioner following the petition's filing. The court noted that the petitioner remains free to file appropriate applications before the competent forum if he has any other grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 13-Apr-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  5. 04-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 11-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/3217/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court disposed of Nipun Kumar Agarwal's RTI writ petition as infructuous after the respondent authorities divulged the requested information to the petitioner following the petition's filing. The court noted that the petitioner remains free to file appropriate applications before the competent forum if he has any other grievances. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case