RAMAN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAVI KERKETTA, ,SUDARSHAN SHRIVASTAVA — Cont.(Cvl)/887/2024
Next hearing: 17th June 2026.
CNR: JHHC010315422024
Filing Number
Cont.(Cvl)/9468/2024
Filing Date
10-Sep-2024
Registration No
Cont.(Cvl)/887/2024
Registration Date
30-Sep-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 118 )
Sub-Category
Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMAN KUMAR
Adv. YASHVARDHAN,KIRTIVARDHAN,KIRTIVARDHAN, ,PRATAYKSHA BHASKAR,MOHINI PRIYA,ADITYA AMAN,VISHNU PRABHAKAR PATHAK,RITESH SINGH,KIRTIVARDHAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAVI KERKETTA, ,SUDARSHAN SHRIVASTAVA
-
2.MR PRASHANT KUMAR, FINANCE SECRETARY, GOVT OF JHARKHAND
-
3.MR NITISH KUMAR, DIRECTOR, PLANNING AND FINANCE (NATIONAL SAVINGS DIVISION) RANCHI
-
4.ACCOUNTANT GENERAL,JHARKHAND P.O.- DORANDA P.S.- DORANDA
Adv. SUDARSHAN SHRIVASTAVA
Case History
-
17-Jun-2026
Next hearingPending
-
17-Jun-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF
Case Summary: Raman Kumar's contempt petition against Jharkhand State alleges non-compliance with a writ court order directing payment of salary arrears. While MACP benefits were granted, the State admitted no affidavit was filed on disbursement of arrear differences. The court adjourned the case to 17.06.2026, directing the opposing party to file a compliance affidavit and rejecting a show cause filed by the Deputy Secretary (not a party to proceedings), holding that only the impleaded functionary bears accountability for certifying contempt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
-
07-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
-
06-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
-
10-Apr-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
20-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
11-Mar-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
27-Feb-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
13-Feb-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
06-Feb-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
04-Dec-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
04-Dec-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
03-Dec-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
25-Nov-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
25-Nov-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
31-Oct-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
31-Oct-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
19-Sep-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
22-Aug-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
22-Aug-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
11-Jul-2025
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
-
11-Jul-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
04-Jul-2025
Admission
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
11-Apr-2025
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
21-Feb-2025
Admission
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
07-Feb-2025
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
09-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. PathakView PDF
-
18-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. PathakView PDF
-
18-Oct-2024
Admission
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. Pathak
-
04-Oct-2024
Admission
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. Pathak
-
25-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
10-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/887/2024
Case Summary: Raman Kumar's contempt petition against Jharkhand State alleges non-compliance with a writ court order directing payment of salary arrears. While MACP benefits were granted, the State admitted no affidavit was filed on disbursement of arrear differences. The court adjourned the case to 17.06.2026, directing the opposing party to file a compliance affidavit and rejecting a show cause filed by the Deputy Secretary (not a party to proceedings), holding that only the impleaded functionary bears accountability for certifying contempt. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts