GOVIND PRASAD vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAHUL SABOO, ,ASHOK KR YADAV — Cont.(Cvl)/876/2024
Next hearing: : -.
CNR: JHHC010312412024
Filing Number
Cont.(Cvl)/9349/2024
Filing Date
07-Sep-2024
Registration No
Cont.(Cvl)/876/2024
Registration Date
28-Sep-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
Coram
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CONTEMPT ( 118 )
Sub-Category
Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.GOVIND PRASAD
Adv. Advocate- ,SAURAV MAHTO,Navneet Toppo
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - RAHUL SABOO, ,ASHOK KR YADAV
-
2.SHRI UMA SHANKAR SINGH, SECRETARY TO THE SCHOOL EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT, JHARKHAND
-
3.SHRI UTKARSH KUMAR GUPTA, DIRECTOR, SECONDARY EDUCATION
-
4.SHRI SHUSHIL KUMAR, DISTRICT EDUCATION OFFICER
Case History
-
—
Next hearingPending
-
08-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan PrasadView PDF
The Jharkhand High Court adjourned the contempt case, directing it to be listed after the Supreme Court disposes of the related S.L.P. (Civil) Diary No. 50590 of 2024. Parties are permitted to mention the case after the Supreme Court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
-
07-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
-
06-May-2026
Admission
Hon'ble Mr.justice Sujit Narayan Prasad
-
28-Mar-2025
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
08-Jan-2025
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. PathakView PDF
-
18-Oct-2024
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. PathakView PDF
-
18-Oct-2024
Admission
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. Pathak
-
04-Oct-2024
Admission
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. Pathak
-
24-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
07-Sep-2024
Case filed
Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/876/2024
The Jharkhand High Court adjourned the contempt case, directing it to be listed after the Supreme Court disposes of the related S.L.P. (Civil) Diary No. 50590 of 2024. Parties are permitted to mention the case after the Supreme Court's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts