PUSHPA MAHATO vs SONALI DUTTA Advocate - MANISH KUMAR, ,MANMOHIT BHALLA,KANISHKA DEO,SWATI SHALINI,AMIT KUMAR DAS,AMIT KUMAR DAS — C.O./4/2026
Next hearing: 10th July 2026.
CNR: JHHC010302732025
Filing Number
C.O./9926/2025
Filing Date
29-Aug-2025
Registration No
C.O./4/2026
Registration Date
17-Apr-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
Cross Objection U/o 41 Rule 22 Of Cpc ( 3 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PUSHPA MAHATO
Adv. ARVIND KR LALL
-
2.TULSI MAHATO
-
3.GOPAL MAHATO
-
4.SABITA MAHATO
-
5.ADITYA MAHATO
Respondent(s)
-
1.SONALI DUTTA Advocate - MANISH KUMAR, ,MANMOHIT BHALLA,KANISHKA DEO,SWATI SHALINI,AMIT KUMAR DAS,AMIT KUMAR DAS
-
2.BRANCH MANAGER, THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED
-
3.RELIANCE GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED THROUGH ITS BRANCH MANAGER
Case History
-
10-Jul-2026
Next hearingPending
-
10-Jul-2026
Orders
Hon'ble The Chief Justice
-
12-Jun-2026
Hon'ble The Chief JusticeView PDF
Summary The High Court of Jharkhand stayed execution of a Tribunal award (dated June 18, 2024) in an insurance claim case, on condition that Reliance Insurance Company deposits the entire awarded amount with interest within 15 days. If the deposit is not made, the stay order will be automatically vacated. The matter is adjourned to July 10, 2026, and applicants must serve remaining respondents with process copies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
26-Nov-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
29-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. C.O./4/2026
Summary The High Court of Jharkhand stayed execution of a Tribunal award (dated June 18, 2024) in an insurance claim case, on condition that Reliance Insurance Company deposits the entire awarded amount with interest within 15 days. If the deposit is not made, the stay order will be automatically vacated. The matter is adjourned to July 10, 2026, and applicants must serve remaining respondents with process copies. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts