BINDESHWARI MANDAL ALIAS BINDESHWARI PRASAD MANDAL vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MITHILESH SINGH — WPC/4635/2023

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010294372023

Filing Number

WPC/7541/2023

Filing Date

16-Aug-2023

Registration No

WPC/4635/2023

Registration Date

22-Aug-2023

Judge

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Coram

Sri Ananda Sen, J.

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

LAND REVENUE , TENANCY & NAZUL ( 146 )

Sub-Category

Spt Act ( 29 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BINDESHWARI MANDAL ALIAS BINDESHWARI PRASAD MANDAL

    Adv. MANOJ KUMAR SAH,PUJA KUMARI,PUJA KUMARI, ,PUJA KUMARI

  2. 2.SHAMBHU MANDAL ALIAS SHAMBHU PRASAD MANDAL

  3. 3.GOPAL MANDAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - MITHILESH SINGH

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER SANTHAL PARGANA DIVISION DUKMA

  3. 3.THE COMMISSIONER SANTHAL PARGANA DIVISION DUMKA

  4. 4.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER GODDA

  5. 5.SURESH MANDAL

  6. 6.MADAN KUMAR MANDAL

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 04-May-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned WPC No. 4635/2023 on 04.05.2026. The court allowed the petitioner's prayer for time to file a substitution petition due to the death of one petitioner. Petitioner's counsel was directed to comply with the earlier order by filing necessary requisites for notice upon the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-May-2026

    Orders

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 24-Mar-2026

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  5. 21-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  6. 03-Oct-2024

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  7. 29-Nov-2023

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 16-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/4635/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Jharkhand adjourned WPC No. 4635/2023 on 04.05.2026. The court allowed the petitioner's prayer for time to file a substitution petition due to the death of one petitioner. Petitioner's counsel was directed to comply with the earlier order by filing necessary requisites for notice upon the respondents. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case