ARVIND KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - ASHOK KR YADAV, ,TEJO MISTRY — WPC/5103/2025

Next hearing: : -.

Next hearing —

CNR: JHHC010293382025

Filing Number

WPC/9632/2025

Filing Date

25-Aug-2025

Registration No

WPC/5103/2025

Registration Date

10-Sep-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

Coram

Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

SERVICE RELATING TO STATE GOVT. ( 171 )

Sub-Category

Appointment ( 23 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Last updated 04-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ARVIND KUMAR

    Adv. CHANCHAL JAIN,ABHISHEK KUMAR,ABHISHEK KUMAR, ,ABHIJEET INDRA GURU,ABHISHEK KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - ASHOK KR YADAV, ,TEJO MISTRY

  2. 2.THE SECRETARY, SCHOOL, EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND

  3. 3.THE DIRECTOR, PRIMARY EDUCATION, SCHOOL, EDUCATION AND LITERACY DEPARTMENT, GOVT. OF JHARKHAND

  4. 4.THE JHARKHAND STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION THROUGH ITS SECRETARY

  5. 5.THE CHAIRMAN, JHARKHAND STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION

  6. 6.THE EXAMINATION CONTROLLER, JHARKHAND STAFF SELECTION COMMISSION

Case History

  1. —

    Next hearingPending

  2. 06-May-2026

    Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF

    The case was adjourned and listed together with W.P.(S). No. 4186 of 2025 for further hearing. The court directed the concerned respondents to file a counter-affidavit in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Mar-2026

    Admission

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  4. 03-Dec-2025

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  5. 03-Dec-2025

    Admission

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.

  6. 19-Sep-2025

    Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF

  7. 19-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. WPC/5103/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The case was adjourned and listed together with W.P.(S). No. 4186 of 2025 for further hearing. The court directed the concerned respondents to file a counter-affidavit in the meantime. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case