AMIT KUMAR SINGH vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND JUSTICE Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR — WPC/5242/2024
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 06th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010290722024
Filing Number
WPC/8637/2024
Filing Date
24-Aug-2024
Registration No
WPC/5242/2024
Registration Date
19-Sep-2024
Judge
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
Coram
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
SERVICE RELATING TO STATE GOVT. ( 171 )
Sub-Category
Appointment ( 23 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
06-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.AMIT KUMAR SINGH
Adv. ASHUTOSH ANAND NO (
-
2.,ANKIT BURMAN,ANKIT BURMAN, ,ANKIT BURMAN
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF LAW AND JUSTICE Advocate - MANOJ KUMAR
-
2.THE REGISTRAR, CIVIL COURT, DHANBAD
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
06-May-2026
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak RoshanView PDF
Case Summary: WPC 5242/2024 Decision: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Amit Kumar Singh, a person with disability who sought appointment as a Grade-IV employee (Peon). The court held that since the 2023 recruitment advertisement contained no specific reservation for disabled persons and the appointment process concluded two years prior, it could not issue directions for his appointment. The court reasoned that creating reservation quotas is a policy matter within the government's discretion, not a judicial function. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Sep-2024
Hon'ble Dr. Justice S. N. PathakView PDF
-
30-Sep-2024
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
23-Sep-2024
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble Mr. Justice Deepak Roshan
-
18-Sep-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
24-Aug-2024
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/5242/2024
Case Summary: WPC 5242/2024 Decision: The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the writ petition filed by Amit Kumar Singh, a person with disability who sought appointment as a Grade-IV employee (Peon). The court held that since the 2023 recruitment advertisement contained no specific reservation for disabled persons and the appointment process concluded two years prior, it could not issue directions for his appointment. The court reasoned that creating reservation quotas is a policy matter within the government's discretion, not a judicial function. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts