RATNESHWAR PRASAD CHOURASIA ALIAS RATAN KUMAR vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P. — Cr.M.P./2287/2025
Case under An Application U/s 528 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 528. Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 08th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010278312025
Filing Number
Cr.M.P./18704/2025
Filing Date
13-08-2025
Registration No
Cr.M.P./2287/2025
Registration Date
19-08-2025
Judge
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Coram
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
CRIMINAL LAW & PROCEDURE ( 121 )
Sub-Category
Restoration ( 18 )
Judicial Branch
Criminal Section
Decision Date
08th May 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RATNESHWAR PRASAD CHOURASIA ALIAS RATAN KUMAR
Adv. SHEO KUMAR SINGH
NUTAN KUMARI
NAWENDU KUMAR
NISHANT KUMAR
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SHAILENDRA KUMAR TIWARI Spl.P.P.
RASHMI REKHA
Hearing History
Judge: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
Admission
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 29-08-2025 | Admission |
Orders
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. 2287/2025 The Jharkhand High Court granted the petitioners' plea to restore Cr.M.P. No. 2886 of 2021 to its original file. The earlier petition had been dismissed for non-prosecution because petitioners' counsel failed to mark the case in the cause list and could not appear when called. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary found the petitioners had valid grounds and would face prejudice without restoration, therefore reinstating the petition to its pre-dismissal stage for hearing before an appropriate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary: Cr.M.P. 2287/2025 The Jharkhand High Court granted the petitioners' plea to restore Cr.M.P. No. 2886 of 2021 to its original file. The earlier petition had been dismissed for non-prosecution because petitioners' counsel failed to mark the case in the cause list and could not appear when called. Justice Anil Kumar Choudhary found the petitioners had valid grounds and would face prejudice without restoration, therefore reinstating the petition to its pre-dismissal stage for hearing before an appropriate bench. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts