MUNIYA DEVI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SACHIN KUMAR — Cont.(Cvl)/1031/2025

Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 10th April 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: JHHC010271252025

Filing Number

Cont.(Cvl)/8908/2025

Filing Date

07-Aug-2025

Registration No

Cont.(Cvl)/1031/2025

Registration Date

12-Aug-2025

Judge

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Coram

Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

Bench Type

Single Bench

Category

CONTEMPT ( 118 )

Sub-Category

Contempt of Courts Act 1971 ( 1 )

Judicial Branch

Civil Section

Decision Date

10-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--Disposed Off

Last updated 15-May-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MUNIYA DEVI

    Adv. RAJIV N. PRASAD,SUSHANT KUMAR SINHA,SUSHANT KUMAR SINHA, ,KUMAR UDAYAN,SUSHANT KUMAR SINHA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - SACHIN KUMAR

  2. 2.SRI VAIBHAV KUMAR SINGH, THE DISTRICT LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER, CHATRA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

    The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the District Land Acquisition Officer, finding no violation of its previous order. The court upheld the officer's referral of the petitioner's land compensation claim to a four-member committee headed by the Additional Collector, as the officer lacked authority to decide such claims independently. The petitioner retains the right to pursue the matter before the competent committee and seek further remedies if no decision is made within a reasonable period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Jan-2026

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  4. 22-Aug-2025

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF

  5. 22-Aug-2025

    Fresh Filing (Admission)

    Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar

  6. 07-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. Cont.(Cvl)/1031/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Jharkhand High Court dismissed the contempt petition against the District Land Acquisition Officer, finding no violation of its previous order. The court upheld the officer's referral of the petitioner's land compensation claim to a four-member committee headed by the Additional Collector, as the officer lacked authority to decide such claims independently. The petitioner retains the right to pursue the matter before the competent committee and seek further remedies if no decision is made within a reasonable period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case