KAMALA RAY vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - KISHORE KR SINGH, ,NAGENDRA PATHAK,ASHISH KUMAR — WPC/3525/2020
Disposed: Contested--Disposed Off on 07th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010268442020
Filing Number
WPC/5689/2020
Filing Date
31-Oct-2020
Registration No
WPC/3525/2020
Registration Date
09-Nov-2020
Judge
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Coram
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
Bench Type
Single Bench
Category
LAND REVENUE , TENANCY & NAZUL ( 146 )
Sub-Category
Mutation Proceeding ( 26 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
07-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Disposed Off
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.KAMALA RAY
Adv. ASHIM KR SAHANI,PRAVEEN KUMAR,PRAVEEN KUMAR, ,AJIT KUMAR,PRAVEEN KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND THROUGH ITS CHIEF SECRETARY Advocate - KISHORE KR SINGH, ,NAGENDRA PATHAK,ASHISH KUMAR
-
2.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM DISTRICT MAGISTRATE EAST SINGHBHUM JAMSHEDPUR
-
3.LAND REFORMS DEPUTY COLLECTOR GHATSHILA
-
4.CIRCLE OFFICER GHATSHILA
-
5.MRS KAMALA DEVI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
07-May-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the writ petition, finding a serious disputed question of title regarding property mutation between the petitioner (claiming ownership via registered gift deed) and respondent no. 5 (asserting co-ownership from original three-brother purchase). The court directed both parties to file a civil suit for proper adjudication of title and proof of the gift deed, with revenue authorities to process mutation thereafter based on the civil court's judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
07-May-2026
Admission
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
04-May-2026
Admission
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
30-Apr-2026
Admission
Sri Ananda Sen, J.
-
04-Feb-2021
Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
04-Feb-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
31-Oct-2020
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/3525/2020
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed the writ petition, finding a serious disputed question of title regarding property mutation between the petitioner (claiming ownership via registered gift deed) and respondent no. 5 (asserting co-ownership from original three-brother purchase). The court directed both parties to file a civil suit for proper adjudication of title and proof of the gift deed, with revenue authorities to process mutation thereafter based on the civil court's judgment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts