BRINCHI KUMAR RAI vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN — WPC/2196/2026
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 04th May 2026.
CNR: JHHC010262032025
Filing Number
WPC/8642/2025
Filing Date
01-Aug-2025
Registration No
WPC/2196/2026
Registration Date
30-Mar-2026
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
MINES AND MINERALS ( 151 )
Sub-Category
Lease Matter ( 7 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
04-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 04-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.BRINCHI KUMAR RAI
Adv. KANTI KUMAR OJHA,SAHJA NAND SARASWATI,SAHJA NAND SARASWATI, ,SAHJA NAND SARASWATI
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND, THROUGH THE SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF MINES AND GEOLOGY Advocate - RAJIV RANJAN
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, GIRIDIH
-
3.THE DISTRICT MINING OFFICER, GIRIDIH,
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
04-May-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed petitioner Brinchi Kumar Rai's writ petition challenging mining authorities' refusal to condone delay in filing a mineral concession renewal application under Rule 23(1) of the Jharkhand Mineral Concession Rules, 2004. The court held that mining authorities lack the power to condone delays in renewal applications, adopting reasoning from a similar precedent case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
04-May-2026
Fresh Filing (Admission)
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
23-Mar-2026
Sri Ananda Sen, J.View PDF
-
15-Sep-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
01-Aug-2025
Case filed
Registration No. WPC/2196/2026
The High Court of Jharkhand dismissed petitioner Brinchi Kumar Rai's writ petition challenging mining authorities' refusal to condone delay in filing a mineral concession renewal application under Rule 23(1) of the Jharkhand Mineral Concession Rules, 2004. The court held that mining authorities lack the power to condone delays in renewal applications, adopting reasoning from a similar precedent case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts