NOOR ISLAM vs THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KAUSHIK SARKHEL — C.Rev./58/2021
Disposed: Contested--Dismissed on 25th March 2026.
CNR: JHHC010260432021
Filing Number
C.Rev./4816/2021
Filing Date
26-Aug-2021
Registration No
C.Rev./58/2021
Registration Date
27-Aug-2021
Judge
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Coram
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
Bench Type
Division Bench
Category
CIVIL PROCEDURE & LIMITATION ( 113 )
Sub-Category
REVIEW (ORDER 47 RULE 1 CPC). ( 11 )
Judicial Branch
Civil Section
Decision Date
25-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--Dismissed
Last updated 14-Apr-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.NOOR ISLAM
Adv. MD. ASADUL HAQUE,BIRENDRA KUMAR,BIRENDRA KUMAR, ,BIRENDRA KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF JHARKHAND Advocate - KAUSHIK SARKHEL
-
2.THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER CUM PRESIDENT SARVA SIKSHA ABHIYAN PAKUR
-
3.DISTRICT PROGRAM OFFICER PAKUR
-
4.SUB DIVISIONAL OFFICER PAKUR
-
5.CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM OFFICER PAKUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
25-Mar-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
Summary The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Noor Islam's review petition challenging his denial of appointment as a Para Teacher. The court upheld the earlier decision, holding that since the petitioner lacked mandatory qualifications (B.Ed or TET certification) by the April 1, 2010 cut-off date prescribed by NCTE Act and Rules, a mere recommendation could not confer legal appointment rights, and equality cannot be claimed for illegal appointments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
25-Mar-2026
High on Board
Hon'ble The Chief Justice , Hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh Shankar
-
26-Feb-2026
Hon'ble The Chief Justice,hon'ble Mr.justice Rajesh ShankarView PDF
-
28-Sep-2021
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
26-Aug-2021
Case filed
Registration No. C.Rev./58/2021
Summary The Jharkhand High Court dismissed Noor Islam's review petition challenging his denial of appointment as a Para Teacher. The court upheld the earlier decision, holding that since the petitioner lacked mandatory qualifications (B.Ed or TET certification) by the April 1, 2010 cut-off date prescribed by NCTE Act and Rules, a mere recommendation could not confer legal appointment rights, and equality cannot be claimed for illegal appointments. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts